<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hubris in the Heartland</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sublimeoblivion.com/2009/02/17/hubris-in-the-heartland/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sublimeoblivion.com/2009/02/17/hubris-in-the-heartland/</link>
	<description>Anatoly Karlin on Eurasia, geopolitics, and peak oil</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:07:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shifting Winds &#124; Sublime Oblivion</title>
		<link>http://www.sublimeoblivion.com/2009/02/17/hubris-in-the-heartland/#comment-2059</link>
		<dc:creator>Shifting Winds &#124; Sublime Oblivion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 02:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sublimeoblivion.com/?p=579#comment-2059</guid>
		<description>[...] The Afghanistan quagmire will likely be seen by future historians as an American strategic blunder of the first magnitude. First, it developed as a simple reaction to al-Qaeda&#8217;s use of Afghanistan as a base to plot out the 9/11 attacks, yet apart from that, the expansionist Taleban were a much bigger problem for Iran and Russia than for the US (even as the US oil corporation Unocal, with the backing of the CIA, was negotiating with the Taleban over the construction of a Trans-Afghanistan Pipeline to carry natural gas from Turkmenistan to the Indian subcontinent in 1998, Iran was seriously threatening war with the Taleban for the murder of Iranian diplomats). By keeping Afghanistan and the Central Asian jihadi threat suppressed, the US uses its own resources to spare Russia&#8217;s and Iran&#8217;s from the necessary work of patrolling Afghanistan&#8217;s borders, aiding the Northern Alliance and other anti-Taleban insurgents, intercepting jihadi aid to their domestic Islamic militants and maintaining the stability of the Central Asian republics. Hence Russia&#8217;s generally quiescent attitude towards allowing the US to transport non-military.... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Afghanistan quagmire will likely be seen by future historians as an American strategic blunder of the first magnitude. First, it developed as a simple reaction to al-Qaeda&#8217;s use of Afghanistan as a base to plot out the 9/11 attacks, yet apart from that, the expansionist Taleban were a much bigger problem for Iran and Russia than for the US (even as the US oil corporation Unocal, with the backing of the CIA, was negotiating with the Taleban over the construction of a Trans-Afghanistan Pipeline to carry natural gas from Turkmenistan to the Indian subcontinent in 1998, Iran was seriously threatening war with the Taleban for the murder of Iranian diplomats). By keeping Afghanistan and the Central Asian jihadi threat suppressed, the US uses its own resources to spare Russia&#8217;s and Iran&#8217;s from the necessary work of patrolling Afghanistan&#8217;s borders, aiding the Northern Alliance and other anti-Taleban insurgents, intercepting jihadi aid to their domestic Islamic militants and maintaining the stability of the Central Asian republics. Hence Russia&#8217;s generally quiescent attitude towards allowing the US to transport non-military&#8230;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

