<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Russia-Georgia War?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sublimeoblivion.com/2009/08/04/new-russia-georgia-war/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sublimeoblivion.com/2009/08/04/new-russia-georgia-war/</link>
	<description>Anatoly Karlin on Eurasia, geopolitics, and peak oil</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 23:15:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mariana K.</title>
		<link>http://www.sublimeoblivion.com/2009/08/04/new-russia-georgia-war/#comment-4894</link>
		<dc:creator>Mariana K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 23:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sublimeoblivion.com/?p=2193#comment-4894</guid>
		<description>Did the Georgians not enter Tskhinvali because they had received reports of illegal Russian movements towards Georgia? I believe it is very one sided to blame everything on Georgia when it is clear that both parties, even South Ossetia, acted against the norms of International law.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did the Georgians not enter Tskhinvali because they had received reports of illegal Russian movements towards Georgia? I believe it is very one sided to blame everything on Georgia when it is clear that both parties, even South Ossetia, acted against the norms of International law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shifting Winds &#124; Sublime Oblivion</title>
		<link>http://www.sublimeoblivion.com/2009/08/04/new-russia-georgia-war/#comment-2063</link>
		<dc:creator>Shifting Winds &#124; Sublime Oblivion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 02:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sublimeoblivion.com/?p=2193#comment-2063</guid>
		<description>[...] the Russian resurgence (may be manifested in renewed expansionism in the post-Soviet space &#8211; Georgia, Crimea and the Baltics are potential flashpoints &#8211; and the race of countries like Germany, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the Russian resurgence (may be manifested in renewed expansionism in the post-Soviet space &#8211; Georgia, Crimea and the Baltics are potential flashpoints &#8211; and the race of countries like Germany, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Averko</title>
		<link>http://www.sublimeoblivion.com/2009/08/04/new-russia-georgia-war/#comment-1952</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Averko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 20:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sublimeoblivion.com/?p=2193#comment-1952</guid>
		<description>Erm why?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erm why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AK</title>
		<link>http://www.sublimeoblivion.com/2009/08/04/new-russia-georgia-war/#comment-1950</link>
		<dc:creator>AK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 16:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sublimeoblivion.com/?p=2193#comment-1950</guid>
		<description>Erm, no, they don&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erm, no, they don&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Averko</title>
		<link>http://www.sublimeoblivion.com/2009/08/04/new-russia-georgia-war/#comment-1945</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Averko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 13:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sublimeoblivion.com/?p=2193#comment-1945</guid>
		<description>AK&#039;s comments relate to the thought that the coverage would be noticeably better if the commentariot structure implemented a more effective quality control.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AK&#8217;s comments relate to the thought that the coverage would be noticeably better if the commentariot structure implemented a more effective quality control.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AK</title>
		<link>http://www.sublimeoblivion.com/2009/08/04/new-russia-georgia-war/#comment-1943</link>
		<dc:creator>AK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 08:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sublimeoblivion.com/?p=2193#comment-1943</guid>
		<description>Well, I guess 10 out of the 89 people voting in this poll, not to mention Pavel Felgenhauer and the Chechen mujahideen, were in fact wrong. Thanks for participating, anyway - I have a feeling future years will be just as interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I guess 10 out of the 89 people voting in this poll, not to mention Pavel Felgenhauer and the Chechen mujahideen, were in fact wrong. Thanks for participating, anyway &#8211; I have a feeling future years will be just as interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Perils of Water &#124; Sublime Oblivion</title>
		<link>http://www.sublimeoblivion.com/2009/08/04/new-russia-georgia-war/#comment-1864</link>
		<dc:creator>Perils of Water &#124; Sublime Oblivion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 05:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sublimeoblivion.com/?p=2193#comment-1864</guid>
		<description>[...] said they&#8217;re not exactly the most reliable of sources (they were wrong in their prediction that Russia would invade Georgia in mid-August 2008) and there could be genuine infrastructural reasons for the dam failure, such as the well-known [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] said they&#8217;re not exactly the most reliable of sources (they were wrong in their prediction that Russia would invade Georgia in mid-August 2008) and there could be genuine infrastructural reasons for the dam failure, such as the well-known [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leos Tomicek</title>
		<link>http://www.sublimeoblivion.com/2009/08/04/new-russia-georgia-war/#comment-1822</link>
		<dc:creator>Leos Tomicek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 14:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sublimeoblivion.com/?p=2193#comment-1822</guid>
		<description>Tbilisi was not convinced about Washington&#039;s support for no reason, Washington did support or at least kept a blind eye on the operation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tbilisi was not convinced about Washington&#8217;s support for no reason, Washington did support or at least kept a blind eye on the operation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Armstrong</title>
		<link>http://www.sublimeoblivion.com/2009/08/04/new-russia-georgia-war/#comment-1820</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Armstrong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sublimeoblivion.com/?p=2193#comment-1820</guid>
		<description>Salome Zurabishvili -- very interesting and informed person.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salome_Zourabichvili

What a lot of these discussions miss is the testimony of Georgians who used to be in the govt and know Saakashvili well.
For example former Defence Minister Okruashvili and former Ambassador to Russia Kitsmarishvili have both said
1. it was always intended to use force
2. Tbilisi was ready earlier in the year to attack but held off
3. Tbilisi was convinced that Washington supported it.

Check my hyperlinks at 
http://www.russiaotherpointsofview.com/2009/08/russian-federation-weekly-sitrep.html#more
for sources</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Salome Zurabishvili &#8212; very interesting and informed person.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salome_Zourabichvili" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salome_Zourabichvili</a></p>
<p>What a lot of these discussions miss is the testimony of Georgians who used to be in the govt and know Saakashvili well.<br />
For example former Defence Minister Okruashvili and former Ambassador to Russia Kitsmarishvili have both said<br />
1. it was always intended to use force<br />
2. Tbilisi was ready earlier in the year to attack but held off<br />
3. Tbilisi was convinced that Washington supported it.</p>
<p>Check my hyperlinks at<br />
<a href="http://www.russiaotherpointsofview.com/2009/08/russian-federation-weekly-sitrep.html#more" rel="nofollow">http://www.russiaotherpointsofview.com/2009/08/russian-federation-weekly-sitrep.html#more</a><br />
for sources</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AK</title>
		<link>http://www.sublimeoblivion.com/2009/08/04/new-russia-georgia-war/#comment-1816</link>
		<dc:creator>AK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 05:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sublimeoblivion.com/?p=2193#comment-1816</guid>
		<description>Let me be the devil&#039;s / Felgenhauer&#039;s advocate here...

Nuclear-tipped cruise missile can be launched from the two subs in a decapitation strike against the US. No Obama = no &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_football&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;nuclear football&lt;/a&gt; = slowed US retaliation, especially since it would be complemented by destruction of key C4 nodes. Immediately afterwards, US observation satellites are killed or blinded (or not - I don&#039;t know if that is technically possible) and MIRVed RS-18 &quot;Satan&quot; missiles are launched against the silo fields in North Dakota, submarine bases, and airbases with B-2 bombers. Russia&#039;s other SLBMs and attack subs leave port and urban populations are forcibly dispersed into the countryside. They order the US to refrain from retaliating with any surviving nuclear assets on pain of an annihilating countervalue strike by Russian SLBMs and bombers. (Of course this scenario is wholly unrealistic if the US possesses a classified fail-deadly deterrent, though then again as Dr. Strangelove rightly pointed out, keeping it secret defeats its whole purpose).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me be the devil&#8217;s / Felgenhauer&#8217;s advocate here&#8230;</p>
<p>Nuclear-tipped cruise missile can be launched from the two subs in a decapitation strike against the US. No Obama = no <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_football" rel="nofollow">nuclear football</a> = slowed US retaliation, especially since it would be complemented by destruction of key C4 nodes. Immediately afterwards, US observation satellites are killed or blinded (or not &#8211; I don&#8217;t know if that is technically possible) and MIRVed RS-18 &#8220;Satan&#8221; missiles are launched against the silo fields in North Dakota, submarine bases, and airbases with B-2 bombers. Russia&#8217;s other SLBMs and attack subs leave port and urban populations are forcibly dispersed into the countryside. They order the US to refrain from retaliating with any surviving nuclear assets on pain of an annihilating countervalue strike by Russian SLBMs and bombers. (Of course this scenario is wholly unrealistic if the US possesses a classified fail-deadly deterrent, though then again as Dr. Strangelove rightly pointed out, keeping it secret defeats its whole purpose).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
