1. Over the long-term, it is the less-noticed things that generally come to be regarded as the most important. The rise of China, not the war on terror. Peak oil and the declining EROEI of our energy sources, not stock market bumps and falls. And so on. In this spirit, the recent NATO exercises in the Arctic may be a portent of greater things to come. Nine thousand NATO troops from 14 countries are taking part in the Cold Response 2010 exercises off northern Norway, with the participation of Swedish soldiers. They are not new, but they are being expanded in scale in recent years.
The audience to these exercises is obvious – Russia. The melting of the Arctic sea ice is opening up new hydrocarbon deposits and making polar trade routes increasingly viable. This is already unleashing a scramble for the Arctic on the part of nations like Russia, Canada, the US, China, Denmark, and Norway. Part of this new competition will overspill into the military sphere. These exercises are a good example of the geopolitical feedback loops that will constrain hydrocarbon extraction volumes below the level dictated by geology in the absence of political factors.
The bigger picture is that as the world’s hydrocarbon and mineral resources begin to run scarce, there will be more and more resource wars – of which Iraq 2003 was only the first and most prominent. In particular we can expect intensified China – West competition over Africa and the Middle East, and Russia – West competition over the Arctic and Caucasus.
2. Washington is locking down its influence over Romania, with an agreement to station GBI missiles in the country (the previous candidate, Poland, was abandoned, and given Patriot batteries and F-16′s instead). This follows on 1) Moldova’s tilt away from Moscow after the defeat of Voronin’s Communist Party in September 2009, in favor of Romania, and 2) Ukraine’s partial return into the Russian imperial fold. There are also American plans to position warships with Aegis/SM-3 in the Black Sea, ostensibly to protect Europe from Iranian IRBM’s.
Needless to say, Russia is none too happy about this. An expanded American presence in the Balkans may complicate any future intervention in the Caucasus, e.g. a renewed conflict with Georgia or helping Armenia should it be attacked by Azerbaijan. On the larger strategic level, just as Russia is reasserting its influence over core former-Soviet territories, a cordon sanitaire is being constructed around its reemerging empire (albeit this time much further to the east than the old Iron Curtain). Just this last week, the US Navy conducted exercises with the Georgian Navy and announced plans for flight training exercises in the Baltics later in the month.
Equally needless to say, at present Russia does not have any way of arresting Washington’s slow march back to containment. On the other hand, it does have the capability to undermine an increasingly fragile Pax Americana elsewhere. It can render meaningless any US sanctions on Iran’s gasoline imports, and it could even sell the Islamic regime the S-300 anti-aircraft system and information networking equipment, anti-ship cruise missiles, and sea mines that will enhance its chances of closing down the Strait of Hormuz to oil shipping in the case of war with the US.
This is not to imply that we are already plummeting into a new Cold War. But the foundations and trends for it are certainly there, and growing stronger.
3. Quick note on Ukraine. Yanukovych is now firmly entrenched as President of Ukraine, after Tymoshenko’s (loser of the recent elections) coalition government collapsed. Though he has made symbolic overtures to the West, such as visiting Brussels before Moscow, his actions indicate that Ukraine will be drawing a lot closer to Russia.
4. NATO is, of course, no longer near the monolithic anti-Soviet bloc it once was – not surprisingly, given the relative decline of its lynchpin. In particular, there are (very faint) allusions to the Franco-Russian alliance of 1892 in Medvedev’s Monday visit to Paris to talk with Sarkozy about 1) buying four Mistral C&C helicopter carriers, 2) the usual commercial deals, 3) more French participation in Russia’s gas industry, and 4) Russia’s proposed pan-European security treaty that would displace the old Cold War arrangements towards something closer to the even older Concert of Powers.
As usual, we must not overstate the short-term significance. France remains firmly entrenched within its alliances with Germany and the US, while Germany remains Russia’s primary European partners. Over the longer-term, things can change. Germany may soon start returning to sphere-of-influence-politics, while a post-collapse USA is likely to become dominated by isolationist tendencies. In this situation, stronger ties between France and Russia will be in both nations’ geopolitical interest.
5. Collapse of Pax Americana watch. See this Russia Today “Crosstalk” hosted by Peter Lavelle, in which the speakers compare the USSR in the late 1980′s and the US today.
As I have argued before, the similarites are many.
- USA 2009 = USSR 1989 ? (Sublime Oblivion)
- Closing the Collapse Gap / my synopsis of longer essay (Dmitry Orlov)
6. USA watch. Wall Street’s Bailout Hustle by Matt Taibbi details the scams being played by the investment banks on the taxpayers. Personally, I’d reserve more of the blame for the government. Bankers are supposed and expected to be greedy, politicians are the ones *supposed* to look out for their constituents. Barack O’Bush signs extension to the Patriot Act.
The crisis of the regions (Ambrose Evans-Pritchard) - just as Europe has its Latvias, Greeces, Spains, and Irelands, so the US has its Floridas, Arizonas, Michigans, New Jerseys, Pennsylvanias, and Californias.
The Economic Policy Institute says states face a shortfall of $156bn in fiscal 2010. Most are banned by law from running deficits, so they must retrench. Washington has provided $68bn in federal aid, but that depletes the Obama stimulus package.
7. In my last Sublime News #2, I explained my initial lack of mention of the Dubai assassination of a Hamas operative by Mossad was due to its lack of significance. This is not the case for the exposure of Israeli spy rings in Lebanon.
WITH a lot less exposure in the world’s press than it got for its recent Dubai operation, Israel has quietly suffered a string of setbacks in Lebanon, a front-line state with which it has often been at war. Lebanon’s security service says that since November 2008 it has broken up no fewer than 25 Israeli spy rings. The reported arrest this month of a colonel in Lebanese army intelligence, identified solely by the initials GS, brings the number of those charged to 70-plus; 40 of them are in Lebanese police custody. …
Aside from the alleged spies, the Lebanese say they netted fancy surveillance and communications gear disguised, among other innocuous things, as Thermos flasks, canisters of motor oil and battery chargers. The gadgetry may be what gave the game away. Security sources hint that France or perhaps Russia helped the Lebanese by supplying sophisticated systems to monitor and analyse the telecoms data. The Lebanese then homed in on suspicious signals.
Another clue may have pointed to the importance of the signals trail. Last summer, as the spies were being rounded up, a senior man in Unit 8200, the section of Israeli military intelligence tasked with eavesdropping on Israel’s enemies, shot himself in his office. Colleagues blamed “unrequited love”.
I noted back at the beginning of the year that there is a significant chance of a new Israeli-Hezbollah war in 2010. Since the same basic conditions are still in place (standoff with Iran, no prospect of successful sanctions), this severe blow to Israel’s intelligence assets in Lebanon will give Israel an added incentive to launch a demonstrative strike against Iran’s proxy in Lebanon.
8. More on Russia’s demography – the site Demoscope summarizes the demographic results of 2009 (in Russian).
9. The demographic armageddon that no neocon dare name (or: Poland is doomed!) by Mark Adomanis @ True Slant. He correctly points out the illogicality of harping on about how Russia’s demography will lead to its doom, while ignoring Poland‘s even direr straits. Nonetheless, I disagreed with him that Poland is the demographic sick man of Europe. Below is my first reply, which generated an ongoing conversation.
I don’t agree with you that Poland (or Russia) is necessarily worse off than Western Europe, or more precisely, the Teutonia (Germany / Austria) and the Med (Italy / Iberia / Greece) parts of Western Europe. (Obviously France, UK and Scandinavia are better off).
Both Poland’s and Russia’s fertility collapses occurred in the early 1990’s, and since the mid-2000’s both have seen an appreciable and accelerating rise in fertility (especially Russia). That is because women postponed having children during the unstable transition years, but are now beginning to have them in a race before it becomes physiologically impossible.
(Incidentally, I agree with you that Russia is better off than Poland. Not only is Russia’s real TFR now higher, but its desired TFR is higher (2.5 vs 2.1 for Poland), which makes me think that Russia will approach Scandinavian levels of TFR by 2015 (around 1.7-1.8) whereas Poland will remain stuck at 1.4-1.5.)
In comparison, in Teutonia in the early 1970’s and in the Med in the 1980’s, the TFR fell to below 1.5 and has remained stuck there ever since. This means that a generation has already passed, their current child-bearing generation is substantially smaller than the last one and as such they already have no hope of averting big natural population decrease.
So basically, the likes of Russia and Poland still have a “window” of 10 years to raise their TFR back up to sustainable levels. This window has already closed for Germany and Italy.
10. My work on Russia’s demography was publicized by Douglas Muir at A Fistful of Euros, who also described S/O as “an interesting, provocative labor of love” and a “macro-look at Russia with a side order of challenging speculation”. Well put and thanks!
11. I also got a pleasant surprise on discovering one of my posts is cited on Google Scholar, in the paper Chinese among Others: Emigration in Modern Times by Philip A. Kuhn from November 2009.
12. Ed Hugh summarizes the world economy in The “Three Speed” Global Manufacturing Recovery Continues in February.
I’ll note that 1) the Asian region, as well as Brazil and South Africa, show fast manufacturing recovery and continue to decouple from the industrialized nations’ unwinding, and 2) as of now Russia looks its stuck in an L-shaped rut, so perhaps the 6.2% growth predicted by Citigroup for 2010 is too optimistic.
13. Energy blast. Faster than expected well inflation over Ghawa’s new developments. Perhaps we’ll nuke oil shale fields instead. 
14. Climate blast. Lou Grinzo of the excellent Cost of Energy blog compiles the latest in AGW denier extremism. (This is an example of delayed reactions to overshoot, and of the neglected political factor in Limits to Growth whose importance should not be understated).
I’ve become convinced that we’re on a collision course, not just with devastating human impacts from climate change and peak oil, but also with acts of violence committed by the most militant and deluded of the climate change deniers. The bullying has reached astonishing levels, and as much as I would hate to see anyone on any side of this issue be physically harmed or “merely” intimidated, it’s undeniably true that intimidation is already happening and violence can’t be far off.
See also The Rise of Anti-Science Bullying.
Meanwhile, nature couldn’t care less about our affairs, least of all those of reality-deniers. Arctic seabed methane stores destabilizing, venting – this methane trigger is a potential feedback / tipping point that could catapult the climate system into the land of no return.
15. Tech blast. Progress in materials science thanks to development in quantum mechanics. Chickenosaurus: Canadian scientist says he can create dinosaurs from chickens – since we are so hell-bent on recreating Jurassic climatic conditions, might as well accompany it with the period-authentic megafauna. Skinput Turns Any Bodily Surface Into a Touch Interface.
16. War blast. Littoral warriors too pusillanimous to kick pirate ass. Under current plans India to acquire dominant armored force in Eurasia by 2020; not as useful as it sounds due to decreasing utility of tanks in 4GW. North Korea’s catabolic collapse continues. First S-400 battalion is deployed around Moscow.
Tomgram: William Astore, The U.S. Military’s German Fetish. I disagree with most of it.
17. Turkey watch. What’s Really Behind Turkey’s Coup Arrests? (Soner Cagaptay). Apparently, Islamist elements in Turkish politics are asserting supremacy over the secular military. I would appreciate if any Turks or Turkey-watchers could comment.
A mountain has moved in Turkish politics. All shots against the military are now fair game, including those below the belt. The force behind this dramatic change is the Fethullah Gülen Movement (FGH), an ultraconservative political faction that backs the ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP). The FGH was founded in the 1970s by Fethullah Gülen, a charismatic preacher who now lives in the United States but remains popular in Turkey. It is a conservative movement aiming to reshape secular Turkey in its own image, by securing the supremacy of Gülen’s version of religion over politics, government, education, media, business, and public and personal life.
To some, it might appear that the newfound freedom to criticize the military proves that Turkey is becoming a more liberal democracy. But the truth is that Turkey has replaced one “untouchable” organization for another, more dangerous, one. Criticizing the Gülen movement, which controls the national police and its powerful domestic intelligence branch, and which exerts increasing influence in the judiciary, has become as taboo as assailing the military once was. Today, it is those who criticize the Gülen movement who get burned. …
Illegal wiretaps and arbitrary arrests serve to intimidate the public, not prosecute criminals. Because of Ergenekon, Turks who oppose the AKP and the Gülen movement fear to speak their minds freely. If you have doubts, call a friend in Turkey and ask for an opinion of the case. Your friend will respond with details of the weather.
The military, which opposes the AKP and the Gülenists because it sees itself as the virtual guardian of Turkey’s secular polity à la Ataturk’s vision, serving as a bulwark against religion’s domination over politics and government, has become the primary target of this round of politically motivated arrests. …
With the Gülen movement in control of large portions of the government apparatus and running a political witch hunt against its opponents through the Ergenekon case, Turkey is taking a dangerously authoritarian turn. A personal friend and politician from the former Soviet Union once said, “A police state emerges not when the police listen to all the citizens, but when all the citizens fear that they are being listened to.” Welcome to the new Turkey: If you listen carefully, you can hear the political ground shifting below your feet.
PS. I did ask a Turk over Facebook. He said “Ergenekon case is totally a lie and prisoners of this case are innocent” and “Turkish government and preacher named Fethullah Gülen are liar”.
18. China watch. See Question and Answer Session With Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi At Munich Security Conference (h/t Nikolas Gvosdev) for a summary of China’s views on the injustice of US arms sales to Taiwan, the Google affair, and Iran sanctions.
In other news, growth in Chinese military spending falls to 7.5% in 2010, or around 80bn $. As I frequently pointed out is the case for Russia and the US, real military spending is almost always substantially larger than the official figures, sometimes several times over. Taking into account the GDP deflater would provide a real military spending figure of twice that, i.e. 150-200bn $ (a valid adjustment since the bulk of Chinese military product is domestic), and adding in the normal black budgets, structural militarization, etc, will probably yield something in the region of 300-400bn $.
19. Brazil watch. A few months ago the Economist (world’s sleaziest magazine) had a long feature on Brazil takes off.
Now that scepticism looks misplaced. China may be leading the world economy out of recession but Brazil is also on a roll. It did not avoid the downturn, but was among the last in and the first out. Its economy is growing again at an annualised rate of 5%. It should pick up more speed over the next few years as big new deep-sea oilfields come on stream, and as Asian countries still hunger for food and minerals from Brazil’s vast and bountiful land.
Good so far. It’s newly-discovered offshore oil resources will be a boon in the post-peak oil world, as will its other natural riches.
And, in some ways, Brazil outclasses the other BRICs. Unlike China, it is a democracy. Unlike India, it has no insurgents, no ethnic and religious conflicts nor hostile neighbours. Unlike Russia, it exports more than oil and arms, and treats foreign investors with respect.
And the ideologizing begins by the third paragraph.
Just as it would be a mistake to underestimate the new Brazil, so it would be to gloss over its weaknesses. Some of these are depressingly familiar. Government spending is growing faster than the economy as a whole, but both private and public sectors still invest too little, planting a question-mark over those rosy growth forecasts. Too much public money is going on the wrong things. The federal government’s payroll has increased by 13% since September 2008. Social-security and pension spending rose by 7% over the same period although the population is relatively young. Despite recent improvements, education and infrastructure still lag behind China’s or South Korea’s (as a big power cut this week reminded Brazilians). In some parts of Brazil, violent crime is still rampant.
I’ve hi-lighted the fundamental reason why Brazil is very unlikely to become a developed nation within the foreseeable future, unlike east-central Europe, Russia or even China – …”in the 2006 PISA science assessment, only 15.2% of Brazilians possessed skills beyond those needed for purely linear problem-solving, compared with 47.6% of Russian and 51.3% of American students. A country needs to have sizeable cadres of skilled workers to move into added-value manufacturing or complex services. Brainier nations will also assimilate technology more easily and thus their economic “rate of convergence” to developed-world status will be that much faster.” Historically, education is the elixir of growth and the only nations to have truly “caught up” with the developed world in the past fifty years – Japan, Korea, Taiwan, Singapore, … – all had superior education systems.
Nevertheless, the country’s course seems to be set. Its take-off is all the more admirable because it has been achieved through reform and democratic consensus-building. If only China could say the same.
More irrelevant ideologizing. As I remember noting in one of my Tweets, the Economist is far more useful as a portal into the thinking processes of the Western neoliberal elites than as a source of objective analysis.
(Furthermore, Brazil isn’t even all that cuddly liberal).
20. This has been a productive week for observers of reality-disconnected Russophobes and their liberast lackeys.
First off the bat (and I do mean bat), Yulia Latynina, the one who thinks poor people shouldn’t vote. Her latest nuggets of wisdom / Ру. (h/t poemless):
I don’t like human rights, environmental activists or the Olympic Games. You might call me crazy for this belief. After all, these three things are beneficial to mankind, and most of their participants don’t make a lot of money.
Maybe I have been shaped by the fact that I was born in the Soviet Union, a country that was determined to bring peace and happiness to the whole world, and I’m a bit distrustful of these “do-gooders.” I prefer the guys who work for a profit, provided that the country is built in such a way that they contribute to the common good. …
And consider the environment issue. Millions of people are dying from environmental poisons, acids and heavy metals. Who could argue against the fight against pollution? But the Kyoto Protocol does not limit pollutants. It limits completely harmless CO2. The concentration of CO2 in the Jurassic or Devonian periods was from seven to 12 times greater than today. And this is precisely because CO2 is an integral part of the biosphere. It can also be the source of a lucrative trade in carbon quotas. …
The global bureaucracy wants to succeed where the Soviet Union has failed. It is anxious to help the poor and save the planet — not by discovering and making a profit, but by regulating and distributing.
Second, Masha Karp, gold medal winner for Russophobe cliche, with her KGB TV (sic) opus about Russia Today.
Despite the channel’s original name, things that are really happening in Russia today, such as the suppression of free speech and peaceful demonstrations, or the economic inefficiency and corrupt judiciary, are either ignored or their significance played down. Instead, the “Explore Russia” slot offers pretty pictures glorifying the country’s cuisine, arts and crafts and colourful history. …
… It is this complex image of Russia — claiming to share the West’s “ideology” but not subscribing to its values — that is tirelessly promoted by Russia Today, and also by Western PR agencies hired for this purpose, by selected foreign journalists invited to the Valdai Club, where they are wined, dined and fed the Russian perspective on the world, by foundations to promote Russian language and culture and by various less visible activities such as organising abusive postings on foreign newspaper websites. Of course, instead of spending a fortune on all this, the Kremlin could try and change the image of Russia just by changing its own ways. But that doesn’t seem very likely.
Reality check. Every serious nation spends resources on improving its international image – if anything, Russia was came fecklessly late to this game. No self-respecting nation karps on about its failings, real or imagined, much as their detractors might wish to the contrary.
Third, Russian Anti-Americanism: A Priority Target for U.S. Public Diplomacy by Ariel Cohen. Love the juxtaposition of the quasi-academic (quackademic?) layout and the litany of contradictions, unsupported assumptions, and meaningless beigeocratic blather in the content. One of Cohen’s suggestions:
Use public diplomacy strategically to counter the flood of anti-American propaganda from the highest levels of the Russian government. U.S. public diplomacy should focus on reaching ordinary Russians. These efforts should include international broadcasting, Internet campaigns, the launch of a new Russian satellite channel, Web 2.0 social networking, print media, and revamped academic, student, andbusiness exchange programs.
“Web 2.0 social networking”? Really? Why not full-immersion virtual reality interaction while you’re at it?
Cohen assumes that Russian disillusionment with the West came about because of the (mythical) Kremlin clampdown on information and propaganda. In reality, this is very unlikely to be the case since opinion polls show that it is the young, best-educated, and most Internet-savvy Russians – i.e., those who know the West best in Russia – who are also the most dismissive of the West’s superiority complex.
Fourth, as noted by A Good Treaty, neocon sports commentary is amazingly stupid. From the hallowed pages of the Wall Street Journal:
This thought runs against centuries of Russian tradition, but why not try to measure Russia’s greatness by its ability to build a free and prosperous country, a good global citizen at peace with its neighbors? This kind of Russia might also fare better at the Olympics. The four leading medals winners in Vancouver are free-market democracies.
Obviously East Germany was the most democratic nation in history. I mean, it even had the word “democratic” in its name!
21. More inanity from the WSJ. Free market fundamentalism saved Chile from earthquake apocalypse, as per intolerable hack Bret Stephens. Maybe not.
22. Mark Adomanis at True Slant is churning out a stunning, even prodigal, amount of quality output on Russia. Right now, he is on a Da Russophile-sque “myth-busting” roll, exposing the most incompetent Russia analysts / Russophobes (Stephen Blank, Leon Aron), attacking self-hating limp-wristed liberasts like Nemtsov, and defending the “Putin economic model” (at least for being better than the free-for-all 1990′s). A Good Treaty is another Russia blog off to an excellent start, with short and engaging posts on Stalin’s legacy, Latynina’s insanity, and meeting with Kozlovsky.
I wonder how long they’ll last. The frequent pattern I see with good new “Russophile” blogs goes something like the following: Week 1 = loads of well-written, passionate posts; Month 1 = enthuasism remains, output drops to normal; Year 1 = by now many of them get tired of commenting on the same topics, refuting the same myths, and making ridiculing the same cliches, and die of ennui. Examples: Fedia Kriukov, Konstantin, Kirill Pankratov, Moscow Tory, Parallax Brief. Even Da Russophile after a fashion – my blog is now Sublime Oblivion, and Russia is no longer it’s defining focus.
23. @ Russophones / Google Translate users, demography of late Soviet / RF Jewry in latest issue of Demoscope journal.
24. This should be S/O’s theme song.
25. Heroic Latvian hacker calling himself “Neo” steals tax records and exposes corruption in the super-Depressed Baltic state.
26. More humor:
- Pyongyang traffic girl.
- Pan-Turanian wet dream.
- What are your best naked stories?
- KungFu vs Yoga (h/t Dmitry Rogozin)
- Japan’s Hitler manga
- Если бы девушки были как мужчины
27. Religion watch. Catholic Church rehabilitates Marx, so please no more talk of godless commies. (h/t poemless)
Related posts:
Thanks for the kind words, Anatoly. I’ll do my best to keep up. Your fine work is certainly an inspiration.
Also, I’m in total agreement with you about Mark Adomanis, who I definitely hope maintains his very excellent blog/column.
Russia information outlet still sucks as they refuse to give us any information about the real critical issues terrorism and there international networks, organised crime, the Oligarchs, NGO’s operating in Russia and who they are affiliated with, what are the main problems inherited from Yeltsin’s reign and what needs to be done (corruption, court reforms, etc).
Russian disillusionment with the west would have nothing to do with the fact that they launched a war of aggression against and support of Islamic terrorism including (OBL) and genocide against the Serbs in the Balkans, support and financing of a terrorist separatist Chechen regime who is on the NED scholarship payroll and provable evidence to links to international Islamic terrorism, “shock therapy” collapsing the post Soviet industrial economy and putting it into a handful of western aligned Jewish Oligarchs who transferred an estimated $1 trillion to off shore accounts, anti-Russian coloured revolution states in Georgia and Ukraine, the constant 100% negative reporting, etc.
To all the commentators who complain about the current situation in Russia the situation was created by western planned model after the fall of the USSR in 89 especially the Oligarch economic system which is mirrored in Latin American countries.
This is the same Economist hired by the KLA to write propaganda pieces for the KLA regime in Kosovo.
http://www.serbianna.com/blogs/newspost/?p=1526
Not surprised the Economist which is part of the Rothschild media is praising Brazil as LaRouche highlighted in his expose of Banco Santander bank that it is part of a collapsing banking scam buying up Brazilian stock and is part of Rothschild Alpha group banking cartel.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pif5ZwLSHN4
Brazil may not have insurgents but it does have ethnic conflict in the poor slums with violence and death toll between police and criminal gangs exceed that of some war zones like Chechnya and Afghanistan.
And the religious, ethnic and separatist conflicts were sparked or at least aided by western intelligence in the case of China with Xinjing and Tibet for decades since the end of WW2.
Mr Cohen’s suggestion that they should support mass media propaganda they already do that in fact ALL the opposition in Russia like Serbia and other states with a multi-million dollar program financing “human rights” organizations, youth activists, alternative media, websites, political activism raining, etc which were somehow absent during the Oligarchs rule from 96-2000.
I do like the foreign investor comment which YUKO’s was a front for the Rothschild interest in Russia who tried to sell and outsource essentially the Russian economy by selling of YUKOS to Cheney affiliated Chevron-Texaco before the Iraq war oil boom.
I read your exchange with Mark Adomanis. I think you’re basically right about Poland.
There’s one point which is perhaps relevant to the argument, especially if you’re discussing Mark Steyn. Poland is now the most ethnically homogeneous medium-sized nation in Europe. Hitler killed off Poland’s Jews, & Stalin purged the country of eastern Slavs & Germans; so now only tiny minorities are non-Polish. Demographically the country is closer to Japan, South Korea & China (low indigenous birth rates, but value their homogeneity as a social strength, so prefer robots to foreigners).
As Poland gets richer, some of the Muslim immigrant “caravan” in Western Europe will move east into Poland. It already has, on a very small scale. What does this mean for Poland? Has the country been missing out on wonderful opportunities for cultural enrichment? Or has it been lucky to escape social conflict? When a Pole compares his country’s situation with that of France or the UK, what conclusion will he draw?
Maybe Schengen will come under increasing strain, as Polish governments try to stop exporting talented educated Poles (especially medically trained graduates) & importing a difficult-to-assimilate Muslim underclass.
Interesting times ahead.
I think the demographic and ethnic/multicultural issues are separate. As you point out, Poland is remarkably homogeneous by European standards, but even at the level of the dominant ethnicities, Poles are far less fecund than ethnic English or ethnic French. This is because there is little-to-no factual evidence for Steyn’s assertion that France’s and especially the UK’s relatively high TFR rates are caused by immigrants/Muslims. That said, I agree with you that Poles are unlikely to ever welcome the “Muslim immigrant” caravan for cultural reasons.
I think emigration will become a much less pressing issue, so I doubt any Polish challenges to Schengen will come from this area. The Polish economy continued growing even during the recession, and its unemployment is no longer significantly larger than its neighbors’. So I think the pressures for emigration from Poland will subside. Indeed, I’ve seen several stories in 2009 about Poles in Britain returning to Poland.
Agree that increasing Polish prosperity will reduce the skills exodus (though I heard the Sejm was passing a law forcing medical graduates to repay all the costs of their education if they work abroad within a certain number of years of graduation)…
Regarding the UK’s TFR: In 2008, according to the ONS (Office of National Statistics) 24% of UK births were to mothers who were not themselves born in the UK, and the underlying trend was up:
http://www.statistics.gov.uk/cci/nugget.asp?id=369
I doubt that 24% of women in the UK aged 16-40 were born outside the UK, so the immigrant women must have substantially higher fertility.
Muhammad is now the second most popular name for baby boys in the UK; it’s already the most popular name in London, and on present trends will be the most popular name nationally very soon.
http://www.thebabywebsite.com/article.1164.Mohammed_Will_Soon_Be_Most_Popular_UK_Boys_Name.htm
Even within the UK’s settled communities, Pakistani and Bangladeshi families have the highest fertility, as this study shows:
http://iussp2009.princeton.edu/download.aspx?submissionId=93139
Just to make clear. I don’t think the UK or France will become Muslim-majority states any time soon. Yes, Steyn is an alarmist. But a crude antimatter of Steyn’s argument – that nothing significant is happening – doesn’t stand up either.
“Muhammad is now the second most popular name for baby boys in the UK; it’s already the most popular name in London, and on present trends will be the most popular name nationally very soon.”
That sort of statistic doesn’t mean very much, since–as the source notes–Muhammad in all its variants “is often given to boys as an honorary prefix and is followed by the name by which they are commonly known.”
That sort of statistic means VERY much actually, because in 1910 there would have been almost no newborn babies in the UK called Muhammad, and now there are lots. It’s a reasonable working assumption that if parents call their newborn child “Jack” they probably aren’t going to bring him up Muslim, but if they call him “Muhammad” they are.
I think the growing popularity of the name Muhammad is a straightforward byproduct of the growing number of Muslims in the UK. Are you seriously disputing this?
I’m not disputing it, no. I do think that citing the usage of the name “Mohammad” has its limits.
“Mohammad” doesn’t seem to be used as a personal name in the same why I use “Randy” or you might use “George”; it’s just a marker of identity, reasonably common, that’s superseded in everyday use by the other names one might be given. The stiatistic is misleading, in that it can leave people with the impression that that there are many more Muslims than are actually the case (“If Mohammads by themselves are #1, what about all the Ismails?”).
Birth statistics 2008 series FM1 No 37 , pp. 47, Table 9.1
Births from Pakistanis, Bangladeshis, East Africans = 4.5% of all births, round that up to 5% Muslim births. Nowhere near as alarming as the Mohammed stats!
pp. 52, Table 9.5
TFR for UK-born went from 1.8 to 1.6 from 1991 to 2001
2001 TFR: 1.6 East Africans (OK), 3.9 Bangladesh (bad), 4.7 Pakistan (oops).
OK, here you have a valid point. Especially with Pakistani TFR having not budged at all from 1991 to 2001 – this might be of some concern to the Brits. Still, plenty of time for fertility convergence to work its magic…
That said, I was right about “This is because there is little-to-no factual evidence for Steyn’s assertion that France’s and especially the UK’s relatively high TFR rates are caused by immigrants/Muslims.” (at least for the UK).
TFR for UK-born went from 1.8 to 1.6 from 1991 to 2001; TFR for UK-total went from 1.8 to 1.6 from 1991 to 2001. I.e., the two remained equal, so as late as 2001, British immigrants were contributing < |0.1| net TFR to the UK-total TFR.
Dear Mr.Karlin,
With the power of AKP (Adalet ve Kalkinma Partisi)-with descent of religio-Islamic&Capitalism there occur each day new things that could not even be thought of.Secular(ist) TArmy has been undergoing grosse operations directed by a front: the government,anti-republicanist fundemaentalis and pro/devoted-american (another turco bin Laden) F.Gülen Cemaat,their alle lined up co-media (see whats been going on since the last 8 years in turkish media,press especially)…and with forerunners of previously seemingly left-jargon but post-80′s Soros’ open society appliers here…all besides theire revenge against Army but also undermining:a non-AKP persons,opposition existence shuold be overcome.(See what happened to then business giant Turkish Khodorkovsy Cem Uzan).
No doubt this schedule is being operated,directed by US Administration.This is no exaggaration !
It is unknown how deep Americans are operating here-even with their agent.
Last week a questin was addressed to Interior Ministry by a parliamentarion whether the minisher has knowledge about ca 30 US agents in Turkey and the answer was so that they have no info about it: An confession of situation.
I do not think Russians understand whats going on here .
1-US NGO weapons are more lethal than real ones when they are really used
2-Even Turkish Army has lost this war against this front :AKP goverment,their media (especially the newspaper Taraf,etc),Pro Islamic-Conservative Capitalists and their Bureaucracy and Intelligentsia,
I think the Russia will face up harder with such War operations directed by Usa.
Kind Regards from Istanbul
Regarding the Franco-Russian alliance.
I know the UK seems to be sinking into irrelevance, but our little island still occupies a very important strategic position in the eastern Atlantic. You might want us on side too!
I’ve always believed in an Anglo-Russian alliance, and been thought weird as a consequence. Since World War Two the only Brits to advocate it publicly have been A.J.P. Taylor on the left and Enoch Powell on the right. Yet in all three wars to determine Europe’s destiny, Russia and Britain found themselves on the same side. This was not a coincidence. One thing I notice. Both Russia and Britain become most intensively involved in Europe precisely when they’re trying to keep Europe away from them. This was the central misunderstanding of the Cold War. Russian troops were in Germany to keep Europe safely away from Russia, not as some demonic “drang nach Westen”, to conquer the whole continent up to Ireland and Portugal.
BTW – At the time of Britain’s first bid to join the European Community, Edward Heath explained to the Macmillan Cabinet why Adenauer didn’t want the UK to join. According to Heath, Adenauer thought any British government motivated by rational self-interest would do a deal with Russia based around the “Stalin note” (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stalin_Note). This would lead to a disarmed, neutral Germany – Germany as a giant Switzerland, if you will. And Adenauer didn’t want it.
This comment got me thinking of European geopolitics in the 18th century. A rising Russia, surrounded by non-friendly Poland, Sweden, and Turkey. It is friends with the Habsburg Austria, and sometimes Prussia and England. It is almost always aligned against France, which in turn allies with nations like Turkey and Poland to check Habsburg designs. Italy is disunited and Spain is weak.
As I noted in Europe, The Black Continent, a broadly similar geopolitical structure may appear within the next two decades, albeit with some differences – e.g. modern day Germany is more powerful than Prussia, whereas the Habsburg axis has no modern equivalent; Italy is an independent player; Turkey’s power is rising, rather than declining as with the Ottomans; the US remains a significant player.
Based on the 18th century precedent, there is ground to believe that Russia and Britain will pursue good relations – especially since Britain will want for gas supplies since it will be suffering an energy crunch by the mid-2010′s. On the other hand, Britain is closely aligned with the US, whose primary goal is to preempt the emergence of a Eurasian hegemon. Since the Russian Empire is reconsolidating itself, this might limit the scope of any Anglo-Russian friendship.
I suspect the Brits will always feel a special connection with the Anglophone world. Toronto, Sydney and Los Angeles all feel culturally closer than Paris. But the Anglo-American relationship is waning. Obama has snubbed the Brits repeatedly, even as their soldiers die in a US-led war in Afghanistan. And the Brits have noticed this.
I guess my real point is that there’s no fundamental clash of national interest between Russia and Britain. Arguably there was one when Britain had an Asian empire in India. But that’s gone. And we do have significant areas of common interest, especially in Europe.
I love the sleek new look!
Say, have you any words of advice for those blogs at risk of dying of ennui? It’s such a catch 22. You write something out of the mainstream about Russia and everyone hails your courage and insight and freshness, thanks you for providing a good alternative to the rhetoric in the media. But the rhetoric in the media doesn’t evolve, so it seems almost unavoidable to get stuck in the same stagnation as they, since ultimately, such blogs are providing a response to such journalism. Then you end up being accused of beating a dead horse.
Also, when multiple blogs doing this appear at the same time, it’s hardly motivation to continue – as there is someone else already writing what you are thinking.
Hm … Your blog remembered me but not my site, it seems…
Thanks. I simplified the design so as to decrease site downtime, on the recommendation of bluehost. Unfortunately it’s still somewhat laggy despite my removal of pretty much all the non-essential features like the Twitter integration and fancy dropdown menu. I’m going to complain to them some more.
No advice, sorry. As I noted in my interview with Siberian Light, what did it for me was 1) tiredness from refuting the same points over and over again – it’s only fun the first few times, then it really does become something akin to beating a dead horse, and 2) the arrival of Russia: Other Points of View, whose authors, as I understand it, are actually paid to do much the same that some bloggers do for free.
What do you mean by “your blog remembered me but not my site”? I linked there. As for not mentioning you with A Good Treaty and Mark Adomanis, the reason is that they are both are new blogs; your’s is already well-established – you were even complaining about being visited too much!
LOL. No, I meant that when I left a comment, it automatically inserted a url, but it was for my European Trib page.
Had the pleasure of citing your interesting piece on the Heritage anti-Americanism report:
http://publicdiplomacypressandblogreview.blogspot.com/2010/03/war-tourism-how-some-at-us-embassy.html